Why is male circision banned but female circision not?

The stuff you talk about here does not happen to every man who was circised. (The skin bridge, chaffing, the hardening of the skin...) You say "Circision removes a functioning part of the " but it actually doesn't. That skin is really a part of evolution that serves no purpose. There aren't nerves in the skin- the nerves are under the inside of the . I'm not trying to say that everyone should go and get circised. I just think you shouldn't judge parents who do this with their kids. And I hope that you meant to say FEMALE circision is banned-- Really there is NO medical reason whatsoever to circise a male or a female. It is an unnecessary procedure unless the male has a severe hypospadius in which the foreskin can be used to fix it, but I don't judge parents who have their male kids circised.